Home

From Wikibon

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 33: Line 33:
While technology changes have decreased footprint, power loading (amount of power required for a square foot of data center space) and heat load (the amount of heat that has to be removed from a square foot of data center space) have both escalated dramatically. The result is higher energy costs to provide power and extract heat from the data center, and lower utilization of data center floor space because of power and cooling limitations. The technology trends are toward higher heat and power loading, which will exacerbate the problem.  
While technology changes have decreased footprint, power loading (amount of power required for a square foot of data center space) and heat load (the amount of heat that has to be removed from a square foot of data center space) have both escalated dramatically. The result is higher energy costs to provide power and extract heat from the data center, and lower utilization of data center floor space because of power and cooling limitations. The technology trends are toward higher heat and power loading, which will exacerbate the problem.  
-
</p>
+
 
[[Planning a green storage initiative | read more...]]
[[Planning a green storage initiative | read more...]]
|}[[Category:Backup and restore]]<br />[[Category: Blade computing]]<br />[[Category: Business compliance]]<br />[[Category: Clustered storage]]<br />[[Category: DMX]]<br />[[Category: Data classification]]<br />[[Category: Data deduplication]]<br />[[Category: Disaster recovery]]<br />[[Category: ECM]]<br />[[Category: EMC]]<br />[[Category: Email archiving]]<br />[[Category: Email storage]]<br />[[Category: Enterprise mobile wikitips]]<br />[[Category: Green storage]]<br />[[Category: Hitachi]]<br />[[Category: IBM]]<br />[[Category: Managing storage]]<br />[[Category: Mobile Enterprise Wikitips]]<br />[[Category: NAND]]<br />[[Category: SSD]]<br />[[Category: STEC inc]]<br />[[Category: Storage and business compliance]]<br />[[Category: Storage asset management]]<br />[[Category: Storage consolidation]]<br />[[Category: Storage design]]<br />[[Category: Storage disaster recovery]]<br />[[Category: Storage services]]<br />[[Category: Storage vendor management]]<br />[[Category: Storage virtualization]]<br />[[Category: WEB2.0]]<br />[[Category: Wikitips]]
|}[[Category:Backup and restore]]<br />[[Category: Blade computing]]<br />[[Category: Business compliance]]<br />[[Category: Clustered storage]]<br />[[Category: DMX]]<br />[[Category: Data classification]]<br />[[Category: Data deduplication]]<br />[[Category: Disaster recovery]]<br />[[Category: ECM]]<br />[[Category: EMC]]<br />[[Category: Email archiving]]<br />[[Category: Email storage]]<br />[[Category: Enterprise mobile wikitips]]<br />[[Category: Green storage]]<br />[[Category: Hitachi]]<br />[[Category: IBM]]<br />[[Category: Managing storage]]<br />[[Category: Mobile Enterprise Wikitips]]<br />[[Category: NAND]]<br />[[Category: SSD]]<br />[[Category: STEC inc]]<br />[[Category: Storage and business compliance]]<br />[[Category: Storage asset management]]<br />[[Category: Storage consolidation]]<br />[[Category: Storage design]]<br />[[Category: Storage disaster recovery]]<br />[[Category: Storage services]]<br />[[Category: Storage vendor management]]<br />[[Category: Storage virtualization]]<br />[[Category: WEB2.0]]<br />[[Category: Wikitips]]

Revision as of 21:52, 30 December 2008


Latest Peer Incites:

1. Six Wikibon experts break down EMC's recent analyst event (23 Mins)

Media:12-16-08_EMC_Peer_Incite_mashup.mp3


2. Grant, a Sr. Storage Admin at a large bank discusses how heterogeneous storage virtualization can help reduce the budget for 2009. (20 Mins)

Media:11-18-08_Peer_Incite_mashup.mp3‎

Wikitip

Make blade servers as homogeneous as possible

Blade computing works best when organizations apply a ‘one-size-fits-all’ strategy, meaning all the blades in the chassis are as similar as possible and ideally, identical. This means same cpu, same speed, same memory, same everything, including the same vendor. By standardizing on blade servers, operating procedures can assume that every component in the chassis is identical and IT operations doesn’t have to worry about the sensitivity of a particular server component to an application’s unique characteristics. This makes blades more swappable, easier to manage, simpler to back up and cheaper to acquire and inventory. Greater diversity within the chassis defeats many of the benefits of blade computing.

If for whatever reason, you don’t want to enforce this degree of commonality, it is advisable that customers take an N and N-1 approach to blade server technology, meaning standardize on a couple of blade server types, one current technology and one current minus one generation, replacing existing server technologies every few years to keep the infrastructure simple. The business benefits of commonality, as seen in the case examples will outweigh any incremental hardware costs borne by this approach.

View Another Wikitip

Featured Case Study

Financial giant goes green

The corporate IT group of a very large, worldwide financial organization with 100,000 employees, has initiated an ongoing “greening” process. This is focused largely on reducing energy use both to decrease the corporation's carbon footprint while creating a net savings in operational costs over the lifetime of new, more energy-efficient equipment, including new storage systems. This effort is not viewed by the IT administration as a one-time project but rather as a perpetual process of evaluating new technology in part on its energy efficiency and introducing it into the corporate data centers to replace aging systems as appropriate.

read more...

Storage Professional Alerts


Featured How-To Note

Planning a Green Storage Initiative

Fluctuating energy prices have heightened electricity and energy consumption as a major issue within the technology community. IT is a significant consumer of energy and IT energy costs have been rising disproportionately because of continued investment in denser IT equipment. Estimates from the EPA and others indicate that IT will account for 3% of energy consumption by 2012. While technology changes have decreased footprint, power loading (amount of power required for a square foot of data center space) and heat load (the amount of heat that has to be removed from a square foot of data center space) have both escalated dramatically. The result is higher energy costs to provide power and extract heat from the data center, and lower utilization of data center floor space because of power and cooling limitations. The technology trends are toward higher heat and power loading, which will exacerbate the problem. read more...































Personal tools