Portal:Storage/Featured article/Thursday
From Wikibon
(Difference between revisions)
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
[Virtualization\nDesign] {fontsize: 125%; link: Storage_virtualization_design_and_deployment\#Design_phase; } | [Virtualization\nDesign] {fontsize: 125%; link: Storage_virtualization_design_and_deployment\#Design_phase; } | ||
-> {start: right, 1; } | -> {start: right, 1; } | ||
- | [Virtualization\narchitecture decided] { origin: Virtualization\nDesign; offset: 1, | + | [Virtualization\narchitecture decided] { origin: Virtualization\nDesign; offset: 1,2; } |
-> {start: east, 0; } | -> {start: east, 0; } | ||
[Primary\nvendor decided] { origin: Virtualization\narchitecture decided; offset: 02,0; } | [Primary\nvendor decided] { origin: Virtualization\narchitecture decided; offset: 02,0; } |
Revision as of 18:12, 1 February 2007
Storage Virtualization Design and Deployment
Originating Author:
David Floyer
The main impediment to storage virtualization adoption is the lack of multiple storage vendor (heterogeneous) support within available virtualization technologies.
The only practical approach is either to implement a single vendor solution across the whole of the data center (viable only for small and some medium size data centers) or to implement virtualization in one or more of the largest storage pools within a data center. read more
Virtualization Design Milestones
<graph>
node {linkbase: http://www.wikibon.org/index.php?title=; } [Virtualization\nDesign] {fontsize: 125%; link: Storage_virtualization_design_and_deployment\#Design_phase; }
-> {start: right, 1; } [Virtualization\narchitecture decided] { origin: Virtualization\nDesign; offset: 1,2; } -> {start: east, 0; } [Primary\nvendor decided] { origin: Virtualization\narchitecture decided; offset: 02,0; } -> {start: east, 0; } [Storage virtualization\nprocess designed] { origin: Primary\nvendor decided; offset: 02,0; }
</graph>