Portal:Storage
From Wikibon
(85 intermediate revisions not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | + | <meta name="description" content="The Wikibon Data Storage Portal contains data storage industry research, articles, expert opinion, case studies, and data storage company profiles." /> | |
- | < | + | <meta name="title" content="Data Storage Technology Research: Data Storage Portal" /> |
- | < | + | |
- | + | The Wikibon Data Storage Portal contains data storage industry research, articles, expert opinion, case studies, and data storage company profiles. | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | |||
+ | '''Latest Information Storage Research''' | ||
+ | * [http://wikibon.org/wiki/v/Storage_Facts%2C_Figures%2C_Best_Practices%2C_and_Estimates Storage Facts, Figures, Best Practices, and Estimates] | ||
- | |||
- | |||
- | |||
- | + | {| class="wikitable" style="font-size: 80%; text-align: center; width: 95%;" | |
+ | ![[Image:LinkedIn.gif|100px|link=http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=835317&trk=hb_side_g]] | ||
+ | |[[Image:facebook.jpeg|100px|link=http://www.facebook.com/pages/Wikibon/6191646228]] | ||
+ | |[[Image:twitter.jpg|100px|link=http://twitter.com/wikibon]] | ||
+ | |[[Image:blog-2.jpg|100px|link=http://wikibon.org/blog]] | ||
+ | |- | ||
+ | |[http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=835317&trk=hb_side_g >>Join our Group] | ||
+ | |[http://www.facebook.com/pages/Wikibon/6191646228 >>Become a Fan] | ||
+ | |[http://twitter.com/wikibon >>Follow @Wikibon] | ||
+ | |[http://wikibon.org/blog >>Read the Blog] | ||
+ | |-} | ||
- | + | __NOTOC__ | |
- | + | {| | |
- | { | + | |+ |
- | + | | colspan="2" | <tipoftheday category="wikitips" /> | |
- | + | |+ | |
- | + | | width="50%" valign="top" | | |
- | + | ===Featured Case Study=== | |
- | + | [[Image:Student_union.jpg|250px]] | |
- | + | ==[[Virtualization Energizes Cal State University]]== | |
- | + | <p style="color: #666;">John Charles is the CIO of California State University, East Bay (CSUEB) and Rich Avila is Director, Server & Network Operations. In late 2007 they were both looking down the barrel of a gun. The total amount of power being used in the data center was 67KVA. The maximum power from the current plant was 75kVA. PG&E had informed them that no more power could be delivered. They would be out of power in less than six months. A new data center was planned, but would not be available for two years. </p> | |
- | + | [[Virtualization Energizes Cal State University | read more...]] | |
- | + | | valign="top" | | |
- | + | {{Storage professional alerts 2}} | |
- | + | |+ | |
- | + | | valign="top" | | |
- | < | + | ===Featured How-To Note=== |
- | + | [[Image:Storage_virtualization.jpg|left|250px]] | |
- | + | | | |
- | {{ | + | ==[[Storage virtualization design and deployment|Storage Virtualization Design and Deployment]]== |
- | + | <p style="color: #666;">A main impediment to storage virtualization is the lack of multiple storage vendor (heterogeneous) support within available virtualization technologies. This inhibits deployment across a data center. The only practical approach is either to implement a single vendor solution across the whole of the data center (practical only for small and some medium size data centers) or to implement virtualization in one or more of the largest storage pools within a data center. | |
- | + | </p> | |
- | + | [[Storage virtualization design and deployment | read more...]] | |
- | + | |}[[Category:Backup and restore]][[Category: Blade computing]][[Category: Business compliance]][[Category: CDP]][[Category: Careers]][[Category: Careers wikitips]][[Category: Clustered storage]][[Category: Compliance and discovery]][[Category: Enterprise mobile wikitips]] | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | < | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | The | + | |
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + | ||
- | + |
Current revision as of 00:18, 23 February 2010
The Wikibon Data Storage Portal contains data storage industry research, articles, expert opinion, case studies, and data storage company profiles.
Latest Information Storage Research
>>Join our Group | >>Become a Fan | >>Follow @Wikibon | >>Read the Blog |
WikitipExtending Enterprise Key Management to Storage(Source http://xml.coverpages.org/ni2009-02-27-a.html) Brocade, EMC/RSA, HP, IBM, LSI, NetApp, Seagate, and Thales e-Security launched an initiative with OASIS to address the requirements for interoperable key management features for enterprise storage. KMIP (key management interoperability protocol) "establishes a single, comprehensive protocol for communication between enterprise key management servers and cryptographic clients. By defining a protocol that can be used by any cryptographic client, ranging from a simple automated electric meter to very complex disk-arrays, KMIP enables enterprise key management servers to communicate via a single protocol to all cryptographic clients supporting that protocol. Through vendor support of KMIP, an enterprise will be able to consolidate key management in a single enterprise key management system, reducing operational and infrastructure costs while strengthening operational controls and governance of security policy. KMIP addresses the critical need for a comprehensive key management protocol built into the information infrastructure, so that enterprises can deploy effective unified key management for all their encryption, certificate-based device authentication, digital signature, and other cryptographic capabilities." Initial supporting entities for KMIP included Brocade, Cisco, EMC/RSA, HP, IBM, LSI, NetApp, Seagate, and Thales e-Security. Additional statements of support have been received (corporate or individual) from Algorithmic Research (Arx), Axway Software, BeCrypt, CipherOptics, Dajeil, Election Systems and Software, Emulex, Lexmark International, MIT, Mitre Corporation, NIST, Oracle, PayPal, PGP Corporation, Quantum, Red Hat, SafeNet, Skyworth TTG, Sun Microsystems, Symantec, US Department of Defense (DoD), Valicore, Venafi, Verisign, and others. The OASIS KMIP Technical Committee "will develop specification(s) for the interoperability of key management services with key management clients. The specifications will address anticipated customer requirements for key lifecycle management (generation, refresh, distribution, tracking of use, life-cycle policies including states, archive, and destruction), key sharing, and long-term availability of cryptographic objects of all types (public/private keys and certificates, symmetric keys, and other forms of "shared secrets") and related areas." The problem addressed by KMIP, according to the published FAQ document, is "primarily that of standardizing communication between encryption systems that need to consume keys and the key management systems that create and manage those keys. Being able to encrypt and retain access to data requires that encryption keys be generated and stored. To date, organizations deploying encryption have not been able to take advantage of interoperability across encryption and the key management systems. By defining a low-level protocol that can be used to request and deliver keys between any key manager and any encryption system, KMIP enables the industry to have any encryption system communicate with any key management system. Through this interoperability, companies will be able to deploy a single enterprise key management infrastructure to manage keys for all encryption systems in the enterprise that require symmetric keys, asymmetric keys pairs, certificates and other security objects..."
|
Featured Case StudyVirtualization Energizes Cal State UniversityJohn Charles is the CIO of California State University, East Bay (CSUEB) and Rich Avila is Director, Server & Network Operations. In late 2007 they were both looking down the barrel of a gun. The total amount of power being used in the data center was 67KVA. The maximum power from the current plant was 75kVA. PG&E had informed them that no more power could be delivered. They would be out of power in less than six months. A new data center was planned, but would not be available for two years. |
|
Featured How-To Note |
Storage Virtualization Design and DeploymentA main impediment to storage virtualization is the lack of multiple storage vendor (heterogeneous) support within available virtualization technologies. This inhibits deployment across a data center. The only practical approach is either to implement a single vendor solution across the whole of the data center (practical only for small and some medium size data centers) or to implement virtualization in one or more of the largest storage pools within a data center. |