Not Logged In

You could:

Log in
Register

research notes
  • Wikitips
  • Professional Alerts
  • Case Studies
  • How-to Notes
  • Community Questions
research meetings
  • Peer Incite Podcasts
  • Peer Incite Archive
Events
  • Peer Incite meeting - Topic: Best practice in tape backup and recovery
    Oct 7, 12:00-1:00 PM
  • Computerworld: Storage Networking World
    Oct 12-15, 2008
  • Usenix on the Road: Next Generation Storage Networking - 1/2 Day Lecture at the University of North Carolina
    Oct 16, 12:30-4:00 PM
  • Usenix on the Road: Next Generation Storage Networking - 1/2 Day Lecture at Virginia Tech
    Oct 21, 1:30-5:00 PM
  • Usenix on the Road: Next Generation Storage Networking - 1/2 Day Lecture at the University of Maryland
    Oct 22, 9:00-1:00 PM

Announcements
  • 10-07-08 Peer Incite: Best practice in tape backup and recovery
  • IBM's stealth XIV announcement
  • Welcome to Wikibon 2.0!
  • The IBM XIV Storage System Model A14
  • Storage Customers Seeing Green with Conserve IT
Home Profile Peers Wiki Groups Feedback


  • Article
  • Comments (0)
  • Page Protected
  • History
  • Vault
Why is ILM such a challenge for storage vendors?
  • Currently n/a/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
rate this
Last Update: Feb 16, 2008 | 08:40
Viewed 634 times | Community Rating: n/a
Originating Author: David Vellante



Originating Author: Dave Vellante

Information lifecycle management, the holy grail of storage management has been plagued by lack of tangible deliverables, immature or inadequate technologies and lack of definition. The storage industry has been struggling for decades to address this problem and the answer lies in focusing on storage infrastructure and leaving grand application visions to those best suited to deliver.

Storage vendors have over the years attempted to leave their comfort zones of infrastructure and add value further up the application stack, integrating application functionality into roadmaps. This has clouded value propositions and made delivery intangible, hurting the perception of ILM.

Customers should expect storage vendors to deliver flexible and cost-effective infrastructure and leave the application challenges to those most capable of solving such problems.

To comment on this Professional Alert, please follow these simple instructions.

  • Login before editing or commenting on this page.
  • Comment on this article. You also can click the "+" tab above.
  • Please sign your comments by typing "~~~" at the end of your comment.

Community Comments

categories
Managing storage, Storage and business compliance, Storage professional alerts
Contributors

Dab4168

Comments (0)
Comments on 'Why is ILM such a challenge for storage vendors?'
There are currently no comments. Be the first!
Post A Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment, please Sign in

Revision ID Author Timestamp Comment
13988 Dab4168 08 Feb 16 20:40:42 Removed category Author dvellante
7039 Dvellante 07 Mar 01 15:25:06
7038 Dvellante 07 Mar 01 15:24:36
6989 Dvellante 07 Feb 28 23:57:34

Search:

news feed
  • Latest from Computerworld - Game economy grows with micropayments
  • eWeek - RSS Feeds - 5 Technology Businesses Poised to Boom in the Financial Crisis
  • InfoWorld RSS Feed - Microsoft lays out SQL Server roadmap
  • SearchStorage: News and trends in the storage industry - F5 Networks adds 10 GigE to ARX file virtualization product
  • Byte and Switch: - F5 Enhances File Virtualization Storage, Management
all »
blogs
  • Storagezilla - Sun batter NetApp in court
  • DrunkenData.com - Market Woes
  • StorageMojo - 3.5″ drives: the end is near
  • StorageRap - Mashup in blogland - will there be a future feeding franzy in 09?
  • Chuck's Blog - Virtual IT: A Frictionless World?
all »
companies
  • Dell
  • 3PAR
  • Sun
  • HP
  • LSI
  • STEC inc
all »
Want a Wikibon
Peer Incite
newsletter?

Email: Privacy by Safe Subscribe
Storage Spectrum
Order Storage Spectrum
By Fred Moore
US & Canada Only!
Browse best practices . publish tips . access project tools . collaborate with peers . get help on RFP's . use privacy settings to control who sees your info . join a group and share experiences with colleagues . review case studies . read professional alerts
  • Cloud Computing
    Clustered storage, Storage services, WEB2.0
  • Companies
    3PAR, Compellent, Dell, EMC, EqualLogic, HP, Hitachi, IBM, LSI, LeftHand Networks, NetApp, STEC inc, Sun, XIV
  • Data Protection
    Backup and restore, Business compliance, CDP, Data deduplication, Storage disaster recovery, Storage security
  • Energy Efficiency
    Data deduplication, Green storage, MAID, Thin provisioning, Tiered storage, VMware, Virtual tape
  • Planning Design Implementation Management
    Backup and restore, Business compliance, Data classification, Green storage, Managing storage, ROI, SRM, Storage Design, Storage asset management, Storage capacity management, Storage capacity planning, Storage implementation, Storage management, Storage operations, Storage planning, Storage vendor management, Tiered storage
  • Storage networks
    Clustered storage, ISCSI, NAS, SAN, SRM, Storage consolidation, Tiered storage, VMware
  • Virtualization
    Clustered storage, Green storage, Storage consolidation, Storage virtualization, Thin provisioning, VMware, Virtual tape
© Wikibon 2008 About Wikibon l Contacts l Terms of Service l Disclaimers l Privacy l Help