Not Logged In

You could:

Log in
Register

research notes
  • Wikitips
  • Professional Alerts
  • Case Studies
  • How-to Notes
  • Community Questions
research meetings
  • Peer Incite Podcasts
  • Peer Incite Archive
Events
  • Enterprise Architect Summit 2008
    Oct 4-6, 2008
  • Computerworld: Storage Networking World
    Oct 12-15, 2008
  • Energy Efficiency and Sustainability Symposium
    Nov 5-6, 2008
  • End-to-End Reliability: The Green Horizon
    Nov 15-18, 2008
  • Business Continuity Planning 2008: Architecting a Reliable Data Management and Protection Plan
    Nov 18, 3:00-7:30 AM

Announcements
  • 10-07-08 Peer Incite: Best practice in tape backup and recovery
  • IBM's stealth XIV announcement
  • Welcome to Wikibon 2.0!
  • The IBM XIV Storage System Model A14
  • Storage Customers Seeing Green with Conserve IT
Home Profile Peers Wiki Groups Feedback


  • Article
  • Comments (0)
  • Page Protected
  • History
  • Vault
Virtual tape: Keep the org chart handy
  • Currently n/a/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
rate this
Last Update: Feb 16, 2008 | 08:35
Viewed 650 times | Community Rating: n/a
Originating Author: David Vellante

Originating Author: David Vellante

Despite the growing appeal of hybrid virtual tape solutions that integrate disk as a 'cache buffer' to tape and introduce technologies such as data de-duplication and encryption, today’s virtual tape is unlikely to be the archiving technology of choice on its own. This is because today's virtual tape solutions are mostly designed to address backup and restore (BUR) problems and don't typically include the requisite hardware security module (HSM), data classification and data movement technologies needed to satisfy true archive requirements.

For offline deep archiving, virtual tape is probably not suitable in most cases, and the compliance, legal, risk management and records management functions in organizations will require continued off-site archiving and tape practices to be instituted perhaps as part of but more likely outside virtual tape infrastructure.

The growing schism between structured and unstructured data and the continued pressure to secure information and ensure these assets do not become liabilities means that storage administrators will be interfacing with and explaining to various oversight functions where virtual tape fits and how it affects archiving capabilities and ultimately corporate risk.

Action Item: Organizations implementing virtual tape must consider archiving-like capabilities as part of their data protection strategies that will satisfy the legal, compliance, risk and records management functions within organizations. Tape and associated archiving software capabilities will be a continued part of these solutions.

Action Item:

Footnotes:

Backup_and_restore,Business_compliance,Data_deduplication,Disaster_recovery,Storage_and_business_compliance,Storage_disaster_recovery,Storage_professional_alerts,Tiered_storage,Virtual_tape,Dvellante

categories
Backup and restore, Business compliance, Data deduplication, Disaster recovery, Storage and business compliance, Storage disaster recovery, Storage professional alerts, Tiered storage, Virtual tape
Contributors

Dab4168

Bert Latamore

Comments (0)
Comments on 'Virtual tape: Keep the org chart handy'
There are currently no comments. Be the first!
Post A Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment, please Sign in

Revision ID Author Timestamp Comment
13979 Dab4168 08 Feb 16 20:35:23 Removed category Author dvellante
10342 Bert Latamore 07 Sep 05 12:08:04
10328 Dvellante 07 Sep 04 18:46:12 Virtual tape strategies need to consider the legal, audit, compliance and other corporate functions

Search:

news feed
  • Latest from Computerworld - Ask.com upgrade to add improved relevance, speed
  • eWeek - RSS Feeds - Passports: Another Bad Use of Self-Signed Certificates
  • InfoWorld RSS Feed - Google, Yahoo delay ad deal over DOJ investigation
  • Byte and Switch: - Unitrends Enhances Rapid Recovery Backup Platform
  • SearchStorage: News and trends in the storage industry - FalconStor CEO: Recovering data is problem No. 1
all »
blogs
  • DrunkenData.com - Market Woes
  • Storagezilla - Winter arrives
  • StorageMojo - 3.5″ drives: the end is near
  • Chuck's Blog - Virtual IT: A Frictionless World?
  • Hu Yoshida - This down turn requires a focus on ROA
all »
companies
  • LeftHand Networks
  • Hitachi
  • NetApp
  • Sun
  • LSI
  • IBM
all »
Want a Wikibon
Peer Incite
newsletter?

Email: Privacy by Safe Subscribe
Storage Spectrum
Order Storage Spectrum
By Fred Moore
US & Canada Only!
Browse best practices . publish tips . access project tools . collaborate with peers . get help on RFP's . use privacy settings to control who sees your info . join a group and share experiences with colleagues . review case studies . read professional alerts
  • Cloud Computing
    Clustered storage, Storage services, WEB2.0
  • Companies
    3PAR, Compellent, Dell, EMC, EqualLogic, HP, Hitachi, IBM, LSI, LeftHand Networks, NetApp, STEC inc, Sun, XIV
  • Data Protection
    Backup and restore, Business compliance, CDP, Data deduplication, Storage disaster recovery, Storage security
  • Energy Efficiency
    Data deduplication, Green storage, MAID, Thin provisioning, Tiered storage, VMware, Virtual tape
  • Planning Design Implementation Management
    Backup and restore, Business compliance, Data classification, Green storage, Managing storage, ROI, SRM, Storage Design, Storage asset management, Storage capacity management, Storage capacity planning, Storage implementation, Storage management, Storage operations, Storage planning, Storage vendor management, Tiered storage
  • Storage networks
    Clustered storage, ISCSI, NAS, SAN, SRM, Storage consolidation, Tiered storage, VMware
  • Virtualization
    Clustered storage, Green storage, Storage consolidation, Storage virtualization, Thin provisioning, VMware, Virtual tape
© Wikibon 2008 About Wikibon l Contacts l Terms of Service l Disclaimers l Privacy l Help