Not Logged In

You could:

Log in
Register

research notes
  • Wikitips
  • Professional Alerts
  • Case Studies
  • How-to Notes
  • Community Questions
research meetings
  • Peer Incite Podcasts
  • Peer Incite Archive
Events
  • Enterprise Architect Summit 2008
    Oct 4-6, 2008
  • Peer Incite meeting - Topic: Best practice in tape backup and recovery
    Oct 7, 12:00-1:00 PM
  • Computerworld: Storage Networking World
    Oct 12-15, 2008
  • Usenix on the Road: Next Generation Storage Networking - 1/2 Day Lecture at the University of North Carolina
    Oct 16, 12:30-4:00 PM
  • Usenix on the Road: Next Generation Storage Networking - 1/2 Day Lecture at Virginia Tech
    Oct 21, 1:30-5:00 PM

Announcements
  • 10-07-08 Peer Incite: Best practice in tape backup and recovery
  • IBM's stealth XIV announcement
  • Welcome to Wikibon 2.0!
  • The IBM XIV Storage System Model A14
  • Storage Customers Seeing Green with Conserve IT
Home Profile Peers Wiki Groups Feedback


  • Article
  • Comments (0)
  • Page Protected
  • History
  • Vault
The necessary evil of data migrations
  • Currently n/a/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
rate this
Last Update: Feb 20, 2008 | 06:58
Viewed 601 times | Community Rating: n/a
Originating Author: 66.202.41.205



Originating Author: Robert Levine

Data migrations are rarely seen as “value-added” technology activities, but rather as a “necessary evil” deriving from the need to consolidate storage, implement stronger technology controls, upgrade / replace systems, and merge / rationalize technologies. This makes keeping management focus – the holders of IT budget – a particular challenge. Therefore it is necessary to present a strong business case to them that outlines the business advantages of controlled data migrations, justified in traditional cost-benefit form. A clear migration must support that business case, bringing together all of the pieces of the puzzle – storage and tool vendor support, internal or external staffing, requirements, and performance metrics.

Where the enterprise already possesses staffing, tools, and experience, migrations become a matter of staffing costs and the objective becomes minimizing staff time necessary to perform migrations (accomplished through clear strategy, requirements, design, and implementation planning). Data migration tools can cost from tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars, and good data analysts and developers can cost from $80,000 to over $100,000 in major IT markets.

Related Research

Data migration strategies

Designing tiered storage

Implementing tiered storage

  • Please login before editing or commenting on this page.
  • Comment on this article. You also can click the "+" tab above.
  • Please sign your comments by typing "~~~" at the end of your comment.

Community Comments

categories
Professional alerts, Storage professional alerts
Contributors

Dab4168

Dvellante

Comments (0)
Comments on 'The necessary evil of data migrations'
There are currently no comments. Be the first!
Post A Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment, please Sign in

Revision ID Author Timestamp Comment
14150 Dab4168 08 Feb 20 18:58:02 Removed categories Opinion & Storage opinion
6628 Dvellante 07 Feb 21 14:16:28
5907 68.189.241.40 07 Feb 09 12:34:57
5906 68.189.241.40 07 Feb 09 12:33:30 /* Related Research */
5905 68.189.241.40 07 Feb 09 12:33:14
5904 68.189.241.40 07 Feb 09 12:31:33
5903 68.189.241.40 07 Feb 09 12:29:57
5902 68.189.241.40 07 Feb 09 12:29:38
5851 66.202.41.205 07 Feb 07 10:28:53
5850 66.202.41.205 07 Feb 07 10:28:36
5849 66.202.41.205 07 Feb 07 10:28:00
5848 66.202.41.205 07 Feb 07 10:26:02

Search:

news feed
  • Latest from Computerworld - Game economy grows with micropayments
  • eWeek - RSS Feeds - 5 Technology Businesses Poised to Boom in the Financial Crisis
  • InfoWorld RSS Feed - Microsoft lays out SQL Server roadmap
  • SearchStorage: News and trends in the storage industry - F5 Networks adds 10 GigE to ARX file virtualization product
  • Byte and Switch: - F5 Enhances File Virtualization Storage, Management
all »
blogs
  • Storagezilla - Sun batter NetApp in court
  • DrunkenData.com - Market Woes
  • StorageMojo - 3.5″ drives: the end is near
  • StorageRap - Mashup in blogland - will there be a future feeding franzy in 09?
  • Chuck's Blog - Virtual IT: A Frictionless World?
all »
companies
  • XIV
  • Hitachi
  • HP
  • Sun
  • NetApp
  • IBM
all »
Want a Wikibon
Peer Incite
newsletter?

Email: Privacy by Safe Subscribe
Storage Spectrum
Order Storage Spectrum
By Fred Moore
US & Canada Only!
Browse best practices . publish tips . access project tools . collaborate with peers . get help on RFP's . use privacy settings to control who sees your info . join a group and share experiences with colleagues . review case studies . read professional alerts
  • Cloud Computing
    Clustered storage, Storage services, WEB2.0
  • Companies
    3PAR, Compellent, Dell, EMC, EqualLogic, HP, Hitachi, IBM, LSI, LeftHand Networks, NetApp, STEC inc, Sun, XIV
  • Data Protection
    Backup and restore, Business compliance, CDP, Data deduplication, Storage disaster recovery, Storage security
  • Energy Efficiency
    Data deduplication, Green storage, MAID, Thin provisioning, Tiered storage, VMware, Virtual tape
  • Planning Design Implementation Management
    Backup and restore, Business compliance, Data classification, Green storage, Managing storage, ROI, SRM, Storage Design, Storage asset management, Storage capacity management, Storage capacity planning, Storage implementation, Storage management, Storage operations, Storage planning, Storage vendor management, Tiered storage
  • Storage networks
    Clustered storage, ISCSI, NAS, SAN, SRM, Storage consolidation, Tiered storage, VMware
  • Virtualization
    Clustered storage, Green storage, Storage consolidation, Storage virtualization, Thin provisioning, VMware, Virtual tape
© Wikibon 2008 About Wikibon l Contacts l Terms of Service l Disclaimers l Privacy l Help