Not Logged In

You could:

Log in
Register

research notes
  • Wikitips
  • Professional Alerts
  • Case Studies
  • How-to Notes
  • Community Questions
research meetings
  • Peer Incite Podcasts
  • Peer Incite Archive
Events
  • Enterprise Architect Summit 2008
    Oct 4-6, 2008
  • Peer Incite meeting - Topic: Best practice in tape backup and recovery
    Oct 7, 12:00-1:00 PM
  • Computerworld: Storage Networking World
    Oct 12-15, 2008
  • Usenix on the Road: Next Generation Storage Networking - 1/2 Day Lecture at the University of North Carolina
    Oct 16, 12:30-4:00 PM
  • Usenix on the Road: Next Generation Storage Networking - 1/2 Day Lecture at Virginia Tech
    Oct 21, 1:30-5:00 PM

Announcements
  • 10-07-08 Peer Incite: Best practice in tape backup and recovery
  • IBM's stealth XIV announcement
  • Welcome to Wikibon 2.0!
  • The IBM XIV Storage System Model A14
  • Storage Customers Seeing Green with Conserve IT
Home Profile Peers Wiki Groups Feedback


  • Article
  • Comments (0)
  • Page Protected
  • History
  • Vault
Technology implications for three-node disaster recovery
  • Currently n/a/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
rate this
Last Update: Mar 19, 2008 | 05:42
Viewed 694 times | Community Rating: n/a
Originating Author: 68.167.139.254

Originating Author: David Floyer

In the 2/26/07 Wikibon Storage Research meeting (see Storage ménage à trois for disaster recovery testing we concluded that certain core infrastructure industries and their suppliers need to consider architecting a three-node data center to improve testing and resiliency. We also concluded that there will be significant internal technology constraints to the adoption of this approach by organizations.

To ensure that they can position themselves in the future for such technologies, organizations should ensure that all key applications and their support applications are identified, and the constraints to adoption of three-node topologies understood and documented. They must also ensure that all new systems do not contain constraints to three-node DR, and when possible and appropriate ensure that existing key systems are modified to remove those constraints.

Key action item: Ensure that there is a robust relationship between the business impact analysis (BIA) outputs and the DR architectures that can minimize the impacts. In particular, ensure that the distance of the “C” site is not so far away that it extends recovery times and compromises the recovery objectives.

categories
Storage disaster recovery, Storage professional alerts
Contributors

Dab4168

Dvellante

Comments (0)
Comments on 'Technology implications for three-node disaster recovery'
There are currently no comments. Be the first!
Post A Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment, please Sign in

Revision ID Author Timestamp Comment
14761 Dab4168 08 Mar 19 17:42:35 misc
14730 Dab4168 08 Mar 19 16:40:54 Removed box from page
13818 Dab4168 08 Feb 16 19:03:49 removed category Author Dfloyer
7502 68.167.139.254 07 Mar 12 03:19:31
7268 Dvellante 07 Mar 06 22:30:24
7266 Dvellante 07 Mar 06 22:27:40
7236 Dvellante 07 Mar 05 18:39:43
7233 68.167.139.254 07 Mar 05 18:31:16

Search:

news feed
  • Latest from Computerworld - Game economy grows with micropayments
  • eWeek - RSS Feeds - 5 Technology Businesses Poised to Boom in the Financial Crisis
  • InfoWorld RSS Feed - Microsoft lays out SQL Server roadmap
  • SearchStorage: News and trends in the storage industry - F5 Networks adds 10 GigE to ARX file virtualization product
  • Byte and Switch: - F5 Enhances File Virtualization Storage, Management
all »
blogs
  • Storagezilla - Sun batter NetApp in court
  • DrunkenData.com - Market Woes
  • StorageMojo - 3.5″ drives: the end is near
  • StorageRap - Mashup in blogland - will there be a future feeding franzy in 09?
  • Chuck's Blog - Virtual IT: A Frictionless World?
all »
companies
  • LeftHand Networks
  • Compellent
  • LSI
  • HP
  • IBM
  • Sun
all »
Want a Wikibon
Peer Incite
newsletter?

Email: Privacy by Safe Subscribe
Storage Spectrum
Order Storage Spectrum
By Fred Moore
US & Canada Only!
Browse best practices . publish tips . access project tools . collaborate with peers . get help on RFP's . use privacy settings to control who sees your info . join a group and share experiences with colleagues . review case studies . read professional alerts
  • Cloud Computing
    Clustered storage, Storage services, WEB2.0
  • Companies
    3PAR, Compellent, Dell, EMC, EqualLogic, HP, Hitachi, IBM, LSI, LeftHand Networks, NetApp, STEC inc, Sun, XIV
  • Data Protection
    Backup and restore, Business compliance, CDP, Data deduplication, Storage disaster recovery, Storage security
  • Energy Efficiency
    Data deduplication, Green storage, MAID, Thin provisioning, Tiered storage, VMware, Virtual tape
  • Planning Design Implementation Management
    Backup and restore, Business compliance, Data classification, Green storage, Managing storage, ROI, SRM, Storage Design, Storage asset management, Storage capacity management, Storage capacity planning, Storage implementation, Storage management, Storage operations, Storage planning, Storage vendor management, Tiered storage
  • Storage networks
    Clustered storage, ISCSI, NAS, SAN, SRM, Storage consolidation, Tiered storage, VMware
  • Virtualization
    Clustered storage, Green storage, Storage consolidation, Storage virtualization, Thin provisioning, VMware, Virtual tape
© Wikibon 2008 About Wikibon l Contacts l Terms of Service l Disclaimers l Privacy l Help