Not Logged In

You could:

Log in
Register

research notes
  • Wikitips
  • Professional Alerts
  • Case Studies
  • How-to Notes
  • Community Questions
research meetings
  • Peer Incite Podcasts
  • Peer Incite Archive
Events
  • Enterprise Architect Summit 2008
    Oct 4-6, 2008
  • Computerworld: Storage Networking World
    Oct 12-15, 2008
  • Energy Efficiency and Sustainability Symposium
    Nov 5-6, 2008
  • End-to-End Reliability: The Green Horizon
    Nov 15-18, 2008
  • Business Continuity Planning 2008: Architecting a Reliable Data Management and Protection Plan
    Nov 18, 3:00-7:30 AM

Announcements
  • 10-07-08 Peer Incite: Best practice in tape backup and recovery
  • IBM's stealth XIV announcement
  • Welcome to Wikibon 2.0!
  • The IBM XIV Storage System Model A14
  • Storage Customers Seeing Green with Conserve IT
Home Profile Peers Wiki Groups Feedback


  • Article
  • Comments (0)
  • Page Protected
  • History
  • Vault
Make blade servers as homogeneous as possible
  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
rate this
Last Update: Feb 11, 2008 | 05:24
Viewed 293 times | Community Rating: 5
Originating Author: Wikibon Daemon

Blade computing works best when organizations apply a ‘one-size-fits-all’ strategy, meaning all the blades in the chassis are as similar as possible and ideally, identical. This means same cpu, same speed, same memory, same everything, including the same vendor. By standardizing on blade servers, operating procedures can assume that every component in the chassis is identical and IT operations doesn’t have to worry about the sensitivity of a particular server component to an application’s unique characteristics. This makes blades more swappable, easier to manage, simpler to back up and cheaper to acquire and inventory. Greater diversity within the chassis defeats many of the benefits of blade computing.

If for whatever reason, you don’t want to enforce this degree of commonality, it is advisable that customers take an N and N-1 approach to blade server technology, meaning standardize on a couple of blade server types, one current technology and one current minus one generation, replacing existing server technologies every few years to keep the infrastructure simple. The business benefits of commonality, as seen in the case examples will outweigh any incremental hardware costs borne by this approach.

categories
Blade computing, Storage consolidation, Wikitips
Contributors

Comments (0)
Comments on 'Make blade servers as homogeneous as possible'
There are currently no comments. Be the first!
Post A Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment, please Sign in

Revision ID Author Timestamp Comment
13387 Wikibon Daemon 08 Feb 11 17:22:47 New page: Blade computing works best when organizations apply a [[Blade computing isn't for everyone|‘one-size-fits-all’ strategy]], meaning all the blades in the chassis are as similar as possi...

Search:

news feed
  • Latest from Computerworld - Ask.com upgrade to add improved relevance, speed
  • eWeek - RSS Feeds - Passports: Another Bad Use of Self-Signed Certificates
  • InfoWorld RSS Feed - Google, Yahoo delay ad deal over DOJ investigation
  • Byte and Switch: - Unitrends Enhances Rapid Recovery Backup Platform
  • SearchStorage: News and trends in the storage industry - FalconStor CEO: Recovering data is problem No. 1
all »
blogs
  • DrunkenData.com - Market Woes
  • Storagezilla - Winter arrives
  • StorageMojo - 3.5″ drives: the end is near
  • Chuck's Blog - Virtual IT: A Frictionless World?
  • Hu Yoshida - This down turn requires a focus on ROA
all »
companies
  • Sun
  • EqualLogic
  • XIV
  • 3PAR
  • IBM
  • LSI
all »
Want a Wikibon
Peer Incite
newsletter?

Email: Privacy by Safe Subscribe
Storage Spectrum
Order Storage Spectrum
By Fred Moore
US & Canada Only!
Browse best practices . publish tips . access project tools . collaborate with peers . get help on RFP's . use privacy settings to control who sees your info . join a group and share experiences with colleagues . review case studies . read professional alerts
  • Cloud Computing
    Clustered storage, Storage services, WEB2.0
  • Companies
    3PAR, Compellent, Dell, EMC, EqualLogic, HP, Hitachi, IBM, LSI, LeftHand Networks, NetApp, STEC inc, Sun, XIV
  • Data Protection
    Backup and restore, Business compliance, CDP, Data deduplication, Storage disaster recovery, Storage security
  • Energy Efficiency
    Data deduplication, Green storage, MAID, Thin provisioning, Tiered storage, VMware, Virtual tape
  • Planning Design Implementation Management
    Backup and restore, Business compliance, Data classification, Green storage, Managing storage, ROI, SRM, Storage Design, Storage asset management, Storage capacity management, Storage capacity planning, Storage implementation, Storage management, Storage operations, Storage planning, Storage vendor management, Tiered storage
  • Storage networks
    Clustered storage, ISCSI, NAS, SAN, SRM, Storage consolidation, Tiered storage, VMware
  • Virtualization
    Clustered storage, Green storage, Storage consolidation, Storage virtualization, Thin provisioning, VMware, Virtual tape
© Wikibon 2008 About Wikibon l Contacts l Terms of Service l Disclaimers l Privacy l Help