Not Logged In

You could:

Log in
Register

research notes
  • Wikitips
  • Professional Alerts
  • Case Studies
  • How-to Notes
  • Community Questions
research meetings
  • Peer Incite Podcasts
  • Peer Incite Archive
Events
  • Enterprise Architect Summit 2008
    Oct 4-6, 2008
  • Peer Incite meeting - Topic: Best practice in tape backup and recovery
    Oct 7, 12:00-1:00 PM
  • Computerworld: Storage Networking World
    Oct 12-15, 2008
  • Usenix on the Road: Next Generation Storage Networking - 1/2 Day Lecture at the University of North Carolina
    Oct 16, 12:30-4:00 PM
  • Usenix on the Road: Next Generation Storage Networking - 1/2 Day Lecture at Virginia Tech
    Oct 21, 1:30-5:00 PM

Announcements
  • 10-07-08 Peer Incite: Best practice in tape backup and recovery
  • IBM's stealth XIV announcement
  • Welcome to Wikibon 2.0!
  • The IBM XIV Storage System Model A14
  • Storage Customers Seeing Green with Conserve IT
Home Profile Peers Wiki Groups Feedback


  • Article
  • Comments (0)
  • Page Protected
  • History
  • Vault
IBM and XIV: Web 2.0 or controlling midrange destiny?
  • Currently n/a/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
rate this
Last Update: Mar 25, 2008 | 12:35
Viewed 594 times | Community Rating: n/a
Originating Author: David Vellante

Originating Author: David Vellante

IBM's claims that acquiring XIV was about "positioning the company to address emerging storage opportunities like Web 2.0 applications, digital archives and digital media," are hard to swallow at the moment. While there are similarities, such as dirt cheap components, spreading data and self-healing, Web 2.0 storage attributes include a highly distributed file system, not block-based storage in close proximity.

In fairness to IBM, Andy Monshaw, General Manager IBM System Storage stressed 'long term' and the company may have other 'aha' cards to play in this game of invigorating its storage portfolio. But it seems more likely in the immediate term that IBM has 1) acquired a strong development team and strengthened its ability to attract and retain talent in Israel, an emerging strategic global development center; and 2) taken steps to regain control of its midrange, general purpose storage which the company has ceded to LSI and Netapp.

It's the latter point that will most likely have an impact in the near term and explains why IBM is positioning NEXTRA, XIV's architecture, as far from its current midrange as possible so as not to disrupt demand. But it's highly likely that IBM will begin to deploy higher- and lower-end versions of NEXTRA and migrate existing midrange and even higher-end DS8000 customers to the new architecture.

Picture this. In the second half of 2008, IBM announces a new innovative line of clustered enterprise storage arrays that are virtualized, high performance and scale from very small to very large using dirt cheap, off-the-shelf components. The company puts on a big marketing push largely aimed at migrating (and protecting) existing customers and, as well, attacking traditional monolithic architectures as outdated. Current IBM customers get to buy into the new vision at very attractive prices and IBM may even gain some share in the process.

While this sounds like a familiar refrain from IBM (except for the innovative clustered part) this time the company may have an architecture with some staying power.

Action Item: Loyal IBM customers should take a wait-and-see approach with NEXTRA and push IBM to more credibly position today's offering, or expose the XIV/NEXTRA/clustered storage roadmap to Web 2.0.

Footnotes:

Clustered_storage,IBM,LSI,NetApp,Storage_professional_alerts,XIV,Dvellante

categories
Clustered storage, IBM, LSI, NetApp, Storage professional alerts, XIV
Contributors

Dab4168

Bert Latamore

Comments (0)
Comments on 'IBM and XIV: Web 2.0 or controlling midrange destiny?'
There are currently no comments. Be the first!
Post A Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment, please Sign in

Revision ID Author Timestamp Comment
14914 Dab4168 08 Mar 25 12:35:13 removed category companies
14354 Dab4168 08 Feb 26 17:06:26 Fixed spelling on Category: Netapp
14268 Dab4168 08 Feb 22 18:19:14 Added category: Companies
13927 Dab4168 08 Feb 16 20:11:52 Removed category Author dvellante
12790 Bert Latamore 08 Jan 16 12:54:31
12777 Dvellante 08 Jan 16 01:57:21
12776 Dvellante 08 Jan 16 01:55:01
12775 Dvellante 08 Jan 16 01:53:16 Is IBM's XIV positioning a smoke screen?

Search:

news feed
  • Latest from Computerworld - Game economy grows with micropayments
  • eWeek - RSS Feeds - 5 Technology Businesses Poised to Boom in the Financial Crisis
  • InfoWorld RSS Feed - Microsoft lays out SQL Server roadmap
  • SearchStorage: News and trends in the storage industry - F5 Networks adds 10 GigE to ARX file virtualization product
  • Byte and Switch: - F5 Enhances File Virtualization Storage, Management
all »
blogs
  • Storagezilla - Sun batter NetApp in court
  • DrunkenData.com - Market Woes
  • StorageMojo - 3.5″ drives: the end is near
  • StorageRap - Mashup in blogland - will there be a future feeding franzy in 09?
  • Chuck's Blog - Virtual IT: A Frictionless World?
all »
companies
  • XIV
  • Hitachi
  • EqualLogic
  • EMC
  • LSI
  • STEC inc
all »
Want a Wikibon
Peer Incite
newsletter?

Email: Privacy by Safe Subscribe
Storage Spectrum
Order Storage Spectrum
By Fred Moore
US & Canada Only!
Browse best practices . publish tips . access project tools . collaborate with peers . get help on RFP's . use privacy settings to control who sees your info . join a group and share experiences with colleagues . review case studies . read professional alerts
  • Cloud Computing
    Clustered storage, Storage services, WEB2.0
  • Companies
    3PAR, Compellent, Dell, EMC, EqualLogic, HP, Hitachi, IBM, LSI, LeftHand Networks, NetApp, STEC inc, Sun, XIV
  • Data Protection
    Backup and restore, Business compliance, CDP, Data deduplication, Storage disaster recovery, Storage security
  • Energy Efficiency
    Data deduplication, Green storage, MAID, Thin provisioning, Tiered storage, VMware, Virtual tape
  • Planning Design Implementation Management
    Backup and restore, Business compliance, Data classification, Green storage, Managing storage, ROI, SRM, Storage Design, Storage asset management, Storage capacity management, Storage capacity planning, Storage implementation, Storage management, Storage operations, Storage planning, Storage vendor management, Tiered storage
  • Storage networks
    Clustered storage, ISCSI, NAS, SAN, SRM, Storage consolidation, Tiered storage, VMware
  • Virtualization
    Clustered storage, Green storage, Storage consolidation, Storage virtualization, Thin provisioning, VMware, Virtual tape
© Wikibon 2008 About Wikibon l Contacts l Terms of Service l Disclaimers l Privacy l Help