Not Logged In

You could:

Log in
Register

research notes
  • Wikitips
  • Professional Alerts
  • Case Studies
  • How-to Notes
  • Community Questions
research meetings
  • Peer Incite Podcasts
  • Peer Incite Archive
Events
  • Enterprise Architect Summit 2008
    Oct 4-6, 2008
  • Peer Incite meeting - Topic: Best practice in tape backup and recovery
    Oct 7, 12:00-1:00 PM
  • Computerworld: Storage Networking World
    Oct 12-15, 2008
  • Usenix on the Road: Next Generation Storage Networking - 1/2 Day Lecture at the University of North Carolina
    Oct 16, 12:30-4:00 PM
  • Usenix on the Road: Next Generation Storage Networking - 1/2 Day Lecture at Virginia Tech
    Oct 21, 1:30-5:00 PM

Announcements
  • 10-07-08 Peer Incite: Best practice in tape backup and recovery
  • IBM's stealth XIV announcement
  • Welcome to Wikibon 2.0!
  • The IBM XIV Storage System Model A14
  • Storage Customers Seeing Green with Conserve IT
Home Profile Peers Wiki Groups Feedback


  • Article
  • Comments (0)
  • Page Protected
  • History
  • Vault
Data deduplication has tape looking over its shoulder
  • Currently n/a/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
rate this
Last Update: Mar 25, 2008 | 10:40
Viewed 902 times | Community Rating: n/a
Originating Author: David Vellante

Originating Author: Dave Vellante

Predictions of the death of tape have been forthcoming since tape has been around but for a variety of reasons tape just won't go away. Increasingly, it looks like if it's worth keeping, users should put data on disk. Recent deduplication announcements from the likes of NetApp, IBM and EMC underscore this point as a 'clone everything you ever really might need acess to' strategy is becoming economically feasible.

Tape's uniqueness is it remains removability, so tape vendors are looking at opportunities in offline archiving, as well as fixed content and compliance markets, which according to Horison Information Strategies and Fred Moore are probably more lucrative than traditional backup and restore. But for those customers with mountains of tapes and loads of data that has at least some intrinsic value, using a data deduplication strategy to clone everything on disk is starting to look pretty interesting.

Action Item: Customers should move toward a strategy of using disk for data that at some point will likely be read. Putting data on tape essentially means you'll never get to it again (or at least hope not to have to). Tape should be considered as an offsite medium, used in situations where compliance is the key driver or the economics of tape still make sense.

categories
Backup and restore, Data deduplication, IBM, Managing storage, NetApp, Storage asset management, Storage professional alerts
Contributors

Dab4168

Wikibon Daemon

Comments (0)
Comments on 'Data deduplication has tape looking over its shoulder'
There are currently no comments. Be the first!
Post A Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment, please Sign in

Revision ID Author Timestamp Comment
14860 Dab4168 08 Mar 25 10:40:54 Removed category companies & box
14349 Dab4168 08 Feb 26 17:04:08 Fixed spelling on Category: Netapp
14277 Dab4168 08 Feb 22 18:27:59 Added category: Companies
13903 Dab4168 08 Feb 16 19:58:23 Removed category Author dvellante
13478 Wikibon Daemon 08 Feb 12 09:15:44
10746 Dvellante 07 Sep 26 13:58:51
10230 Dvellante 07 Aug 29 13:20:25
8629 68.189.241.40 07 May 24 15:24:21
8628 68.189.241.40 07 May 24 15:13:17
8623 66.202.41.205 07 May 24 10:49:06
8614 Dvellante 07 May 24 02:57:01

Search:

news feed
  • Latest from Computerworld - Game economy grows with micropayments
  • eWeek - RSS Feeds - 5 Technology Businesses Poised to Boom in the Financial Crisis
  • InfoWorld RSS Feed - Microsoft lays out SQL Server roadmap
  • SearchStorage: News and trends in the storage industry - F5 Networks adds 10 GigE to ARX file virtualization product
  • Byte and Switch: - F5 Enhances File Virtualization Storage, Management
all »
blogs
  • Storagezilla - Sun batter NetApp in court
  • DrunkenData.com - Market Woes
  • StorageMojo - 3.5″ drives: the end is near
  • StorageRap - Mashup in blogland - will there be a future feeding franzy in 09?
  • Chuck's Blog - Virtual IT: A Frictionless World?
all »
companies
  • 3PAR
  • LeftHand Networks
  • XIV
  • Dell
  • NetApp
  • EqualLogic
all »
Want a Wikibon
Peer Incite
newsletter?

Email: Privacy by Safe Subscribe
Storage Spectrum
Order Storage Spectrum
By Fred Moore
US & Canada Only!
Browse best practices . publish tips . access project tools . collaborate with peers . get help on RFP's . use privacy settings to control who sees your info . join a group and share experiences with colleagues . review case studies . read professional alerts
  • Cloud Computing
    Clustered storage, Storage services, WEB2.0
  • Companies
    3PAR, Compellent, Dell, EMC, EqualLogic, HP, Hitachi, IBM, LSI, LeftHand Networks, NetApp, STEC inc, Sun, XIV
  • Data Protection
    Backup and restore, Business compliance, CDP, Data deduplication, Storage disaster recovery, Storage security
  • Energy Efficiency
    Data deduplication, Green storage, MAID, Thin provisioning, Tiered storage, VMware, Virtual tape
  • Planning Design Implementation Management
    Backup and restore, Business compliance, Data classification, Green storage, Managing storage, ROI, SRM, Storage Design, Storage asset management, Storage capacity management, Storage capacity planning, Storage implementation, Storage management, Storage operations, Storage planning, Storage vendor management, Tiered storage
  • Storage networks
    Clustered storage, ISCSI, NAS, SAN, SRM, Storage consolidation, Tiered storage, VMware
  • Virtualization
    Clustered storage, Green storage, Storage consolidation, Storage virtualization, Thin provisioning, VMware, Virtual tape
© Wikibon 2008 About Wikibon l Contacts l Terms of Service l Disclaimers l Privacy l Help