Not Logged In

You could:

Log in
Register

research notes
  • Wikitips
  • Professional Alerts
  • Case Studies
  • How-to Notes
  • Community Questions
research meetings
  • Peer Incite Podcasts
  • Peer Incite Archive
Events
  • Peer Incite meeting - Topic: Best practice in tape backup and recovery
    Oct 7, 12:00-1:00 PM
  • Computerworld: Storage Networking World
    Oct 12-15, 2008
  • Usenix on the Road: Next Generation Storage Networking - 1/2 Day Lecture at the University of North Carolina
    Oct 16, 12:30-4:00 PM
  • Usenix on the Road: Next Generation Storage Networking - 1/2 Day Lecture at Virginia Tech
    Oct 21, 1:30-5:00 PM
  • Usenix on the Road: Next Generation Storage Networking - 1/2 Day Lecture at the University of Maryland
    Oct 22, 9:00-1:00 PM

Announcements
  • 10-07-08 Peer Incite: Best practice in tape backup and recovery
  • IBM's stealth XIV announcement
  • Welcome to Wikibon 2.0!
  • The IBM XIV Storage System Model A14
  • Storage Customers Seeing Green with Conserve IT
Home Profile Peers Wiki Groups Feedback


  • Article
  • Comments (0)
  • Page Protected
  • History
  • Vault
CDP not a general purpose B/R substitute
  • Currently 5/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
rate this
Last Update: Feb 16, 2008 | 07:12
Viewed 661 times | Community Rating: 5
Originating Author: Peter Burris

Originating Author: Peter Burris

CDP is a relatively new class of technology that offers important returns in specific application domains. However, like any relatively new technology, CDP is likely to be oversold. Specialty CDP vendors may sell it as a general purpose backup/restore (B/R) solution; large vendors with poorly performing B/R products may attempt to reposition existing B/R tools as "CDP like," "CDP ready," or "CDP-lite." The Wikibon community recognizes the need for specific CDP capabilities in specific application environments but does not believe CDP technology is, or ever will be, a general purpose substitute for proven B/R solutions, from tape to subsystem replication. Many factors contribute to our thinking, including:

  • Requirements to institute a degree of physical separation between primary and backup systems to accommodate disaster concerns.
  • Significant cost differentials between CDP solutions and much cheaper, yet still high performing automated tape systems.
  • The potential requirement to backup the CDP system.
  • The rapid pace of invention across the B/R technology board.

Action Item: Focus CDP deployment on specific applications featuring significant RPO objectives. Do not try to unilaterally extend CDP into B/R domains being adequately handled by mature B/R technologies.

Action Item:

Footnotes:

Backup_and_restore,CDP,Storage_disaster_recovery,Storage_professional_alerts,PBurris

categories
Backup and restore, CDP, Storage disaster recovery, Storage professional alerts
Contributors

Dab4168

Bert Latamore

Dvellante

Comments (0)
Comments on 'CDP not a general purpose B/R substitute'
There are currently no comments. Be the first!
Post A Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment, please Sign in

Revision ID Author Timestamp Comment
13835 Dab4168 08 Feb 16 19:12:48 removed category Author PBurris
10261 Bert Latamore 07 Aug 30 10:19:55
10252 Dvellante 07 Aug 30 02:13:02
10236 PBurris 07 Aug 29 18:56:05 PB CDP 8/28 professional alert

Search:

news feed
  • Latest from Computerworld - Game economy grows with micropayments
  • eWeek - RSS Feeds - 5 Technology Businesses Poised to Boom in the Financial Crisis
  • InfoWorld RSS Feed - Microsoft lays out SQL Server roadmap
  • SearchStorage: News and trends in the storage industry - F5 Networks adds 10 GigE to ARX file virtualization product
  • Byte and Switch: - F5 Enhances File Virtualization Storage, Management
all »
blogs
  • Storagezilla - Sun batter NetApp in court
  • DrunkenData.com - Market Woes
  • StorageMojo - 3.5″ drives: the end is near
  • StorageRap - Mashup in blogland - will there be a future feeding franzy in 09?
  • Chuck's Blog - Virtual IT: A Frictionless World?
all »
companies
  • XIV
  • HP
  • Dell
  • 3PAR
  • Sun
  • NetApp
all »
Want a Wikibon
Peer Incite
newsletter?

Email: Privacy by Safe Subscribe
Storage Spectrum
Order Storage Spectrum
By Fred Moore
US & Canada Only!
Browse best practices . publish tips . access project tools . collaborate with peers . get help on RFP's . use privacy settings to control who sees your info . join a group and share experiences with colleagues . review case studies . read professional alerts
  • Cloud Computing
    Clustered storage, Storage services, WEB2.0
  • Companies
    3PAR, Compellent, Dell, EMC, EqualLogic, HP, Hitachi, IBM, LSI, LeftHand Networks, NetApp, STEC inc, Sun, XIV
  • Data Protection
    Backup and restore, Business compliance, CDP, Data deduplication, Storage disaster recovery, Storage security
  • Energy Efficiency
    Data deduplication, Green storage, MAID, Thin provisioning, Tiered storage, VMware, Virtual tape
  • Planning Design Implementation Management
    Backup and restore, Business compliance, Data classification, Green storage, Managing storage, ROI, SRM, Storage Design, Storage asset management, Storage capacity management, Storage capacity planning, Storage implementation, Storage management, Storage operations, Storage planning, Storage vendor management, Tiered storage
  • Storage networks
    Clustered storage, ISCSI, NAS, SAN, SRM, Storage consolidation, Tiered storage, VMware
  • Virtualization
    Clustered storage, Green storage, Storage consolidation, Storage virtualization, Thin provisioning, VMware, Virtual tape
© Wikibon 2008 About Wikibon l Contacts l Terms of Service l Disclaimers l Privacy l Help