Not Logged In

You could:

Log in
Register

research notes
  • Wikitips
  • Professional Alerts
  • Case Studies
  • How-to Notes
  • Community Questions
research meetings
  • Peer Incite Podcasts
  • Peer Incite Archive
Events
  • Peer Incite meeting - Topic: Best practice in tape backup and recovery
    Oct 7, 12:00-1:00 PM
  • Computerworld: Storage Networking World
    Oct 12-15, 2008
  • Usenix on the Road: Next Generation Storage Networking - 1/2 Day Lecture at the University of North Carolina
    Oct 16, 12:30-4:00 PM
  • Usenix on the Road: Next Generation Storage Networking - 1/2 Day Lecture at Virginia Tech
    Oct 21, 1:30-5:00 PM
  • Usenix on the Road: Next Generation Storage Networking - 1/2 Day Lecture at the University of Maryland
    Oct 22, 9:00-1:00 PM

Announcements
  • 10-07-08 Peer Incite: Best practice in tape backup and recovery
  • IBM's stealth XIV announcement
  • Welcome to Wikibon 2.0!
  • The IBM XIV Storage System Model A14
  • Storage Customers Seeing Green with Conserve IT
Home Profile Peers Wiki Groups Feedback


  • Article
  • Comments (0)
  • Page Protected
  • History
  • Vault
Better take unstructured content in 'byte-sized' chunks
  • Currently n/a/5 Stars.
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
rate this
Last Update: Feb 20, 2008 | 12:26
Viewed 710 times | Community Rating: n/a
Originating Author: David Vellante

Originating Author: Robert Levine

Deploying unstructured content storage involves implementing a project plan supported by a well-resourced team to classify and index data and set standards and policies in a hardware/software solution. Organizations are more likely to find success with piloted or phased implementations. This can mean initially implementing a solution for only one type of content (medical imaging files, for example), for one business area (trading or sales), and so on. That area must be willing to invest time in testing the storage concept and providing detailed feedback to the project team. Issues with the solution, or with the deployment process itself, can be fleshed out and taken into account in further phases of implementation. A limited scope deployment can take place in a couple of months, while full enterprise deployments can take several months depending upon the degree of standardization, number of content types, amount of storage required, number and nature of policies and rules, and detailed requirements for content access and retrieval.

Finding a starting point with an enthusiastic line of business is critical as the cost of not managing unstructured content can include long legal proceedings, non-compliance with legal discovery requirements, non-compliance with regulatory requirements for archival, and the loss of business opportunities or provision of lower quality products or services due to the inability to properly search content. Measuring the return on investment of an unstructured content storage solution is not any easier than measuring ROI for other process improvements or compliance initiatives (think about email, a telephone, or SOX compliance). But measuring total cost of ownership (TCO), quality of service (QoS) and metrics for capacity, latency, transfer rates, as well as processes like backups, recoveries, provisioning, inventorying, and archiving should be done as rigorously as for structured data storage. One innovation is the use of the MAPS (Megabyte Objects per Second) measurement of storage efficiency - this is more applicable to multimedia and other unstructured content than KAPS (Kilobyte Objects per Second). Also, measuring the ratio of managed storage (for structured and unstructured content) to total storage is one way of tracking the deployment of the unstructured content storage initiative.

Deploying an unstructured content storage solution can take anywhere from a couple to several months to implement from analysis to deployment, depending upon the scope of the effort, the organization’s level of storage maturity, and the amount of funding and resources available to direct at the project. Knowledgeable storage management staff needs to be freed up from operational or other duties to participate in this effort, as do the users who have been identified as key to the proof of concept and testing activities. Since there are many types of solutions available in this emerging technology area, pinning an average cost on a hardware or software implementation is a tricky exercise; nevertheless, only smaller or limited scope implementations would normally cost less than six figures. Medium to larger scope deployments can cost a few to several hundred dollars. Organizations who have undergone such efforts have typically not added new staff to support the project or live system - but many bring on storage consultants, adding $50,000-150,000 to the cost of an implementation.

Action Item: Implementing electronic content management (ECM) systems in small phases will both increase ROI and seed valuable experience that can be applied to other areas of a business. Trying to bite off more than an organization can chew is a recipe for cost overruns, spotty returns and executive frustration which can lead to funding constraints down the road.

categories
Professional alerts, Storage and business compliance, Storage professional alerts
Contributors

Dab4168

Wikibon Daemon

Comments (0)
Comments on 'Better take unstructured content in 'byte-sized' chunks'
There are currently no comments. Be the first!
Post A Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment, please Sign in

Revision ID Author Timestamp Comment
14114 Dab4168 08 Feb 20 12:26:40 Removed category: Opinion (again)
14113 Dab4168 08 Feb 20 12:25:25 Removed category:Opinion
13379 Wikibon Daemon 08 Feb 11 17:04:55
6621 Dvellante 07 Feb 21 14:04:57
6549 Dvellante 07 Feb 20 17:43:01
6484 Dvellante 07 Feb 19 23:01:30
6481 Dvellante 07 Feb 19 22:59:16
6479 Dvellante 07 Feb 19 22:54:04
6476 Dvellante 07 Feb 19 22:49:02
6475 Dvellante 07 Feb 19 22:47:55

Search:

news feed
  • Latest from Computerworld - Game economy grows with micropayments
  • eWeek - RSS Feeds - 5 Technology Businesses Poised to Boom in the Financial Crisis
  • InfoWorld RSS Feed - Microsoft lays out SQL Server roadmap
  • SearchStorage: News and trends in the storage industry - F5 Networks adds 10 GigE to ARX file virtualization product
  • Byte and Switch: - F5 Enhances File Virtualization Storage, Management
all »
blogs
  • Storagezilla - Sun batter NetApp in court
  • DrunkenData.com - Market Woes
  • StorageMojo - 3.5″ drives: the end is near
  • StorageRap - Mashup in blogland - will there be a future feeding franzy in 09?
  • Chuck's Blog - Virtual IT: A Frictionless World?
all »
companies
  • Dell
  • Compellent
  • HP
  • Hitachi
  • 3PAR
  • XIV
all »
Want a Wikibon
Peer Incite
newsletter?

Email: Privacy by Safe Subscribe
Storage Spectrum
Order Storage Spectrum
By Fred Moore
US & Canada Only!
Browse best practices . publish tips . access project tools . collaborate with peers . get help on RFP's . use privacy settings to control who sees your info . join a group and share experiences with colleagues . review case studies . read professional alerts
  • Cloud Computing
    Clustered storage, Storage services, WEB2.0
  • Companies
    3PAR, Compellent, Dell, EMC, EqualLogic, HP, Hitachi, IBM, LSI, LeftHand Networks, NetApp, STEC inc, Sun, XIV
  • Data Protection
    Backup and restore, Business compliance, CDP, Data deduplication, Storage disaster recovery, Storage security
  • Energy Efficiency
    Data deduplication, Green storage, MAID, Thin provisioning, Tiered storage, VMware, Virtual tape
  • Planning Design Implementation Management
    Backup and restore, Business compliance, Data classification, Green storage, Managing storage, ROI, SRM, Storage Design, Storage asset management, Storage capacity management, Storage capacity planning, Storage implementation, Storage management, Storage operations, Storage planning, Storage vendor management, Tiered storage
  • Storage networks
    Clustered storage, ISCSI, NAS, SAN, SRM, Storage consolidation, Tiered storage, VMware
  • Virtualization
    Clustered storage, Green storage, Storage consolidation, Storage virtualization, Thin provisioning, VMware, Virtual tape
© Wikibon 2008 About Wikibon l Contacts l Terms of Service l Disclaimers l Privacy l Help